Please Sign in or Register

Hailstorm Trends

9 January 2008

A study of trends in hail in the United States conducted by Stanley Changnon, Chief Emeritus & Principal Scientist at Illinois State Water Survey, revealed a substantial increase over the last 50 years in the total insured loss amounts. When these data are normalized to the areas at risk and the density changes, he concludes that there has been no increase in frequency or severity and in fact except for occasional periods of high loss has remained steady for 50 years. The overall increase in total dollars is attributed to increased population in risk areas and higher property values.
 
Changnon concluded that higher property values was one aspect of the increase in loss cost associated with hailstorms. Margot Adler in an article for Your Money dated December 17, 2007, talks about the increase in the size of single-family homes. Charts from National Association of Home Builders represent a growth in average size of single-family homes from 983 square feet. in 1950 to 2,349 square feet in 2004.
 
A report from the Federal Housing Finance Board for October 2004 reflects the average house price as $264,540. The most recent report dated November 27, 2007 reflects October 2007 average house price as $295,573. This is a decrease from the average house price in 2005 of $306,759 and the 2006 average house price of $306,258. Even with the drop in housing prices in the last two years, Changnon’s attribution of increased hailstorm costs to the increase in housing costs over the last 50 years is obviously born out.

No Comments » | Posted in General, Catastrophe |


Are Roofing Costs Driving Claim Severity?

9 January 2008

The second quarter of 2007 revealed a substantial increase in average replacement cost value (RCV) for carriers handling claims predominantly in the Midwest. There was a decrease in severity during the same period for carriers with a national claim base.
 
A major Midwest hailstorm in the second quarter, for which roofing is the predominant damage, begged the question of whether a substantial increase in roofing costs accounted for the RCV change. A deeper look revealed this was not the case.
Carriers whose claims are concentrated in the Midwest experienced average severity change from $5,493 in Q1 to a peak of $6,627 in Q3 or an increase of 20.6% in a six-month period. In the fourth quarter the Midwest average RCV is dropping through November 2007 but year-end results are expected to remain well above levels in the first quarter.
 
During this same six-month period the MSB Industry saw a reduction from average RCV of $6,150 to $5,560. This is a Q3 difference of $590 per claim or a 9.6% reduction.
 
A separate study of second and third quarter claims completed by MSB Analytics identified the most significant cost driver for Midwestern claims to be hail followed by wind. The impact was further identified as resulting from four hailstorms including a numbered CAT of June 8, 2007 affecting Southeast Indiana,
Northern Kentucky, Western New York, much of Ohio, Western Pennsylvania and Northwest West Virginia. The three smaller storms combined accounted for fewer claims than those attributed to the June 8 storm alone.
                                                               
Material Prices
 Following the price spikes caused by Hurricane Katrina in the Fall of 2005, material price increases fluctuated and remained artificially high through most of calendar year 2006. The price increase for roofing material did however slow as the housing market began to tighten. The material index change for the 12 months ending June 2007 was down 1.7% for the year but only down 0.3% for the second quarter. This period had a 12.2% decrease in Lumber cost and a 13.1% decrease in Plywood cost which offset any of the gains seen in other materials. By the third quarter of 2007 Plywood had an increase of 1.5% which is the first increase since Katrina.
 
There was an expectation on the part of analysts that we would see oil price increases impacting petroleum based products such as Asphalt Shingles and Roofing Felt. This was based upon expected increases in transportation costs as well as petroleum components for manufacturing. A recent study completed by MSB found that there was no discernable impact on these materials connected to the fuel price indexes. MSB saw a gradual increase in roofing material prices through 2006 however the retail prices flattened in the last quarter of 2007. The volatility of fuel prices is not an indicator of price increases. The August 2007 Consumer Price Index Summary actually reflects a 0.7% drop in Transportation costs over the prior 12 months and a drop in shingle prices in the third quarter of 2007. This drop has not yet reached the retail construction market.          
 
Improvements in transportation routing as well as load management may account for the drop in transportation costs in the face of volatile fuel prices. In a December 2006 article, Corinne Kator, Associate Editor of Modern Material Handling, predicted that there will be changes required in today’s supply chain practices. She quotes Larry Lapide, research director for the Supply Chain 2020 Project at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, as saying that “ Just-in-time manufacturing, offshoring, speeding products to market-even the use of plastic packaging- all rely on ‘cheap oil’. But the world may not be able to count on cheap oil going forward.” The article goes on to say that we might expect a return to on-site warehousing of enough material to sustain production rather than relying on just-in-time supply practice and a return of domestic production in place of currently offshore produced goods. This is based upon the expectation of oil prices continuing to soar. Control of material prices will rely very heavily upon how energy efficiency is managed.
 
Impact of Competition
 Other factors with a direct impact on roofing costs are the slowing of new construction and pricing pressures brought to bear upon manufacturers. In a recent interview, Thomas Beaton, Territory Manager for GAF, the largest North American supplier of roofing material, revealed that their records show a 30% decrease in bids for new construction of residential properties in the last 24 months. According to Beaton, although remodeling and replacement always accounts for a higher percentage of roofing bids, GAF is currently seeing only 20% of these orders attributed to new construction with 80% attributed to replacement.
 
One impact they see on pricing is due to changes in how roofing contractors are sharing the available market. There has been a shift in which large contractors who previously focused on large development contracts are now focusing on more profitable single residence replacement projects. This has left a gap in the much-reduced new construction market which smaller, less established, contractors are pursuing. The competition however is driving prices down applying further pressure on the larger contractors to reduce prices in order to compete.
 
Beaton sees this as a practice driven by groups of contractors who are giving away profits in an effort to establish a book of business. This practice may be contributing to early failure of start up contracting businesses. This competition is significant enough to have an impact on the larger contractors. Beaton estimates that the average roof has a 15 year life span. With 49 million existing homes across the country, he estimates there are 3.5 million replacement roofs applied per year including those replaced early due to remodeling or damage. This volume means that competition will continue for the foreseeable future.
 
Conclusions
 Although MSB has seen a 5% increase in labor costs over the last quarter of 2007 this is believed to be due to a concentration of contract renewals in this period. Roofing prices have remained steady indicating the 20.6% average RCV increase experienced by Midwest regional carriers are the result of spikes related to storm activity and not related to material price increases. With two quarters experience we see average RCV for these carriers dropping gradually but continuing to reflect the increase in hail and wind related losses. MSB continues monitoring claim activity observing factors affecting RCV. As trends become apparent, additional studies involving RCV changes are conducted. The results of those studies will be shared in future issues.

No Comments » | Posted in General, Catastrophe, Feature Articles |


Cunningham Lindsey Best Practices Positively Impact Property Claim Severity, says MSB

27 March 2007

LOS ANGELES and DALLAS – MARCH 27, 2007      
Marshall and Swift / Boeckh (MSB), an MDA company and the leading worldwide provider of building cost data and estimating technology to the property insurance industry, announces that an 18-month property claims analytics engagement with Cunningham Lindsey U.S., Inc., a leader in independent claims adjusting and loss management services, has resulted in improved adjuster performance metrics and tighter controls on claim severity. Significant leakage control programs have been implemented and are generating favorable results in the areas of Deductions for Openings and Line Item Write-ins.
 
“The results of the various analyses have been embraced by Cunningham Lindsey and have produced admirable results. Through the partnership with Claims Analytics both MSB and Cunningham Lindsey continue to investigate and implement additional best practices that will make them one of the most measurably successful players in the industry,” says Jonathan Kost, Senior Vice President of Claims at MSB.
 
"Analytics has allowed Cunningham Lindsey to make steady improvements in our estimating best practices and we continue to strive to exceed established industry performance goals. Our partnership with MSB Analytics has enabled us to not only make improvements in our claims adjustment processes, but also provide current clients as well as prospective clients with verifiable/quantifiable analytic data, aligning our goals with the clients to help manage risk indemnity and control expenses. Cunningham Lindsey continues to raise the bar for other claims adjustment organizations.” said Karl Nann, VP-Director of Property, Cunningham Lindsey US.
 
The Claims Analytics process began in July of 2005 by setting a baseline of claims handling performance that was compared with overall industry standards. Cunningham Lindsey then established goals for individual claims practices that led to improvement in their claims handling processes and differentiates them from other property claims adjustment organizations. 
 
MSB Claims Analytics identified early in the process that deductions for openings was an area where improvement could be made. After starting with a performance benchmark of 87.2 percent, Cunningham Lindsey was able to improve performance to 93.5% of all estimates written. By properly accounting for openings such as windows and doors, Cunningham Lindsey has been able to recommend to its customers that they only  pay for the materials that will be used in a repair operation.
 
Similarly, Claims Analytics helped Cunningham Lindsey initiate a process to monitor line-item write-ins within completed estimates, marking them as exceptions within MSB’s IntegriClaim™ estimating software used by Cunningham Lindsey’s adjusters. The results have been impressive, with the frequency for write-ins at less than 1 percent for claims written in 2006. Management of write-ins not only controls severity but also replaces anecdotal or “guesstimate” pricing with defendable costs based on verifiable cost research.
 
According to Kost, MSB Claims Analytics is a unique combination of expert people, systems, and strategy that interact within a company to bring significant, positive changes to their way of doing business. MSB Analytics has gathered detailed property loss data and performed studies using enormous quantities of claims data, and is able to supply information regarding how their estimates and service results compare to the independent adjuster market, as well as to the claims market as a whole. By using Claims Analytics a company can better assess how claims are handled and develop strategies to improve performance, reduce claims severity, and maintain fair settlement practices.
 
For more information about MSB Claims Analytics, please contact Anthony Hetchler, Director of Analytics, Claims, at 800-809-0016 Ext. 3605 or e-mail Anthony.Hetchler@msbinfo.com 
 
About MSB
 
Marshall & Swift / Boeckh (MSB), an MDA company, is the leading supplier of local building cost information, residential and commercial property valuation technology and services for the property and casualty insurance sector in the United States and Canada. MSB has five offices throughout the U.S. and Canada. For information, please contact Marsha Berenson, Media Coordinator, at 800-285-1288, Ext. 2828, e-mail Marsha.Berenson@msbinfo.com, or visit MSB’s Web site at www.msbinfo.com.
 
About MDA

MDA provides advanced information solutions that capture and process vast amounts of data, produce essential information, and improve the decision making and operational performance of business and government organizations worldwide.

 
Focused on markets and customers with strong repeat business potential, MDA delivers a broad spectrum of earth and space based information solutions, ranging from complex operational systems, to tailored information services, to electronic information products.
 
MDA employs more than 3,000 people in locations across the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. The Company’s common shares trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol TSX:MDA.
 
About Cunningham Lindsey
 
Cunningham Lindsey U.S. Inc. is an independent insurance claims services company, providing a wide range of claims adjusting services including commercial property and liability, personal lines, catastrophe response, and environmental assessment and remediation. Its national network of 135 offices also provides worldwide services through offices of sister companies within the Cunningham Lindsey Group strategically located throughout Canada, the United Kingdom, continental Europe, the Far East, Latin America and the Middle East. CLUS is a subsidiary of Cunningham Lindsey Group Inc., a publicly traded company on The Toronto Stock Exchange (symbol: LIN).
 
For additional information contact David Repinski, C.E.O, at (214) 488-6713, or drepinski@CL-NA.com
 
You may also visit our website at www.cunninghamlindseyus.com

No Comments » | Posted in General, Testimonials, Press Releases |


Case Study — Motorists Insurance Group

10 November 2006

The MSB Claims Analytics Group has provided The Motorists Insurance Group of Columbus Ohio, with technological support, expert analysis, and training resources for several years. With the support of MSB Analytics, Motorists, a company that has historically provided an exceptional level of service to the independent insurance agents who offer its products and services, has trended at the top of the industry in its property claims operations.

The Motorists Insurance Group has always enjoyed a sterling reputation among the host of professional, independent agents who offer its various packages of coverage to their clients. The company’s efficient handling of claims is a major component of the array of services that Motorists’ representative agents and their customers have come to regard so highly.

The professionals at Motorists have achieved high marks in the industry for their service to their clients by maintaining both a strong vision for growth and a phenomenal level of attention to detail that underscores the company’s vision and guarantees its continued success.

Recently, the East Zone Claims Manager for Motorists, Teresa King, offered some insight into the basis for the carrier’s success in the property claims market.

Excellence in the Marketplace

“Our commitment to growth and finding new and even more efficient ways to serve our customers means that we don’t let the current competitive market deter us from accomplishing our mission and fulfilling our vision,” she noted. “We take active steps to do precisely that.”

King stated that the company is currently taking steps to improve vital segments of its service. “Our claims staff is enhancing our service to policyholders by lessening the time between the first contact with the policyholder and the cycle time for inspecting, estimating and paying losses without losing sight of accuracy,” she said.

Motorists is self-avowedly an independent-agent driven company, so it is no accident that every associate of the insurer is committed to maintaining excellent agency relationships. One of the factors that make the company’s relationship with the agents so successful is that the carrier can offer its agents a product that is competitively priced and backed by the industry’s highest level of claims service.

The claims department has set forth on a program that ensures it will achieve the high level of standards the company has historically set for itself. Initiatives include controlling leakage by training adjusters and analyzing the data necessary to implement and monitor the claims best practices. The two go hand in hand, King said.

Education and Execution

“Motorists places a heavy emphasis on the continuing education of our adjusters. Given the difficulty of hiring and maintaining a specialized staff of property adjusters, we provide training to achieve a high skill-set level,” King observed.

To that end, the department offers training sessions designed to update the knowledge base of its staff. Last year’s training package included a focus on the detailed analysis of residential and commercial roofing. This year adjusters will receive additional training on water mitigation and property subrogation.

“MSB’s analytics team has also been a significant factor in our offerings as well,” she stated. “They support our training initiatives with on-site sessions designed to reinforce our understanding of the best practices we’ve adopted along with guidance for optimal use of the estimating software.”

Training is designed to explain and reinforce best practices from both a conceptual and a practical standpoint. “We want our adjusters to understand the philosophy behind the practices. We also want them to follow the best practices so they can write consistently accurate estimates—and that’s highly important,” King stated.

The company has developed a best practice of its own regarding its training regimen. Motorists follows up on its training program with a valuable form of reinforcement. The company’s management attaches the adjuster’s annual performance evaluation to the best practices outcomes the adjusters have been trained to achieve. Monthly statistical analyses and reports Motorists receives from the MSB analytics team offer both individual and company-wide indicators that are used to gauge an adjuster’s effectiveness. These form the basis for the department’s evaluations of its level of excellence.

The Analytics Package

The granular level of detail in these data analyses has impressed the Motorists claims managers and professional staff. With a limited staff, the company relies on that level of reporting for an assessment of how its performance trends with respect to the industry as a whole.

“We don’t have the staffing resources or the means to get as in- depth in the data as we require for maximum quality control, so we need someone to capture that data for us. MSB’s analytics team does a great job of doing precisely that,” King said. “The data we receive from them offers us more than just a monitor of our achievement of the level of procedural operation. We also use the data for its trending analysis that tells us where we’re strong and in what areas we need to improve. The decided advantage of the data is that we cannot only compare ourselves against ourselves, but also against the property claims industry within MSB’s database as a whole.”

MSB’s database, she observed, offers its clients a unique array of industry-wide data that allows them to see where they stack up against their competitors. In Motorists’ case, the story makes for an especially enjoyable read. “We’ve found that through our utilization of best practices methodologies, we are in the vanguard of the industry with respect to the level of excellence in our operation,” King concluded. “Analytics provides a very useful granular guide for us to note how we’re trending compared to our peers.”

Meeting the Challenges Ahead

In the midst of all the good news, there are challenges ahead for the claims function and for Motorists as a whole as they work to maintain the company’s elevated standing in the industry.

“We’ve got to provide the necessary tools to our adjusters that will enhance their level of service to our customers. The products Motorists adopts to achieve their goals and confront the challenges facing them have to feature both ease of use for their staffers and efficiency. It is critical that we are provided with an accurate pricing mechanism,” King noted.

Motorists’ claims department has found that while other technologies offer the company necessary data and reporting functions for analysis, they don’t offer the human analysis in their suite of products. MSB Analytics offers just such a package. As an additional benefit to Motorists, MSB offers this requisite technological support not only for the claims function but for the underwriting function as well, resulting in a much more streamlined operation with both units functioning as highly coordinated and on the same page—a key to the carrier’s outstanding efficiency.

“We greatly appreciate MSB’s analytics staff resources…they give us an uncommon level of support,” King concluded. “They are a vital part of our success story.”

No Comments » | Posted in Testimonials |


Mining Gold From Your Data

10 November 2006

As the property insurance industry moves toward increasing sophistication, full understanding of building and loss characteristics becomes a key to proper underwriting. An Insurance carrier’s claims division with its staff and Independent Adjuster partners is uniquely positioned to help gather high-quality, risk-specific information that is critical for accurately deploying risk-based pricing segmentation models.

However, adjusters presented with arguments for pricing segmentation often reply with “Who cares…this doesn’t impact me”. The reality is that insurance carriers are more dependent than ever on the skill set possessed by their adjusting teams and the information they can provide. In order to fully understand the importance of the adjuster’s role in this process, we must first understand the value of this information to the carrier.

“Show me the Money” — The Carrier Perspective

For decades, property insurance carriers have struggled to make important financial decisions with poor quality data. While these insurance companies have amassed huge quantities of paid claim statistics, this data is of little use when trying to understand characteristics of the risks they insure due to a lack of meaningful detail.

Historically, the value of claims feedback to underwriting has been limited to “risk reports” prepared by adjusters to alert the company to condition issues and other potential problems. Since the adjuster is on site, it is more efficient to take a few extra minutes to fully evaluate the entire structure and gather risk characteristics that can help guide future underwriting decisions.

Information collection using modern technology provides instant, actionable information to the underwriter. Based on risk characteristics, the carrier can evaluate individual properties to ensure the proper amount of coverage (and premium). This process of obtaining a solid Insurance-to-Value (ITV) calculation also collects a wealth of data that can be used in predictive modeling when it is properly archived.

An ITV should consider any remodeling, additions or other improvements for determination of policy premium. The ITV should also verify accuracy of policy limits and adherence to coinsurance requirements. Observations recorded by the adjuster can also reveal risks associated with the property such as a vicious dog, a trampoline or a wood burning stove, etc. Furthermore, hazard characteristics such as terrorism exposure, distance to a fire hydrant, or proximity to a neighboring business with hazardous activities will be noted.

Other observations noted through the adjusting process during an on-site inspection are damage from previous events and pre-existing conditions. The overall quality of the structure can be recorded and archived to determine proper pricing or other business needs. What kind of roof is on the building? What is its damageability? What is the average cost of repairs should it sustain damage? Is age of the roofing material a factor? The answers to questions like this can be provided with the proper data stream.

Finally, collection and examination of loss data will help carriers study rating tiers and allow peril specific exposure mapping. Policy forms can be improved to fit business needs. Even reduction of fraud is capable through meticulous examination of data.

What’s in this for me? The Adjuster’s Perspective

Insurance carriers have always relied on skilled Independent Adjusters (I/As) to assist in the negotiation and settlement of claims. However, control of loss adjusting expenses often overshadows the benefits of employing I/As. The pendulum keeps swinging back and forth over whether a carrier is best served by staff adjusters or an independent staff. Invariably, the arguments hinge on service vs. cost.

The IA’s place in the carrier’s business is more securely established when an Independent Adjuster is able to provide detailed, meaningful information that allows the carrier to properly price and place a risk in addition to settling a claim. In fact, the savvy I/A will market this additional service to their carrier partner as a means of differentiating them from their competition. This is especially powerful when the I/A utilizes data analytics to ensure that the carrier is receiving high-value and high-quality data. In essence, the I/A can generate more business and bill more for their services by providing detailed data.

From the staff perspective, the collection of more granular and actionable information can change the dynamics within the entire organization. In some companies, the claims division is seen as a “necessary evil”. The age-old rivalry between underwriting and claims maintains that “those adjusters keep overpaying claims”. On the other hand, adjusters often believe that the risks they inspect haven’t been properly underwritten. Imagine the relationship that can exist when the underwriters and staff adjusters collaborate fully in the evaluation of the insured risks. Suddenly the claim adjuster has the power to positively impact the carrier’s bottom-line financial results by gathering and providing data that enables the underwriting team to more effectively place and price their risks. This shift can transform the entire claims division from a cost center into a profit center! As a result, a carrier’s claim staff can create more job security for themselves as they drive profitability within the claims division. As with the I/As, data analytics provides an important oversight to help ensure data quality

True Data Analytics provides the ability to study more than just claim totals and summaries of line items. It should capture all property claims data as well as information about the method in which the claim was settled. Analytics should provide trending information about adjuster behavior, price deviations, overhead and profit calculations, and other critical estimate components.

How do I make this happen?

The most effective way to gather granular data is to standardize the use of an estimating tool that electronically archives all data. Ideally, this estimator will use the same database as the underwriter in order to ensure valid comparisons. Further, handling all claims on the same estimator with the same database (regardless of whether the claims are adjusted by a carrier’s employee or an independent adjuster) helps ensure the widest possible data aggregation from which to complete the analysis.

Once the data is collected, this process requires the services of a skillful analyst to identify the risk characteristics that are critical for the underwriting process. A good analyst can help make solid recommendations that drive the business in the right direction. Conversely, even the best data in the hands of an untrained or unskilled staffer is often just meaningless gibberish.

No Comments » | Posted in General, Feature Articles |


The Costly Wave of Katrina’s Overrides

9 November 2006

Hurricane Katrina exposed the costly problem of arbitrary overrides to analysts examining the effect of insurers’ inflated loss ratios resulting from the disaster.

Naturally, a number of price overrides are justified based on specific loss conditions, and a disaster the magnitude of Katrina certainly creates compelling conditions for legitimate overrides. But, in many cases, the price override signals a missed opportunity for the adjuster to negotiate a fair price with a repair vendor. Even a costly emergency like Katrina offers ample opportunity to keep costs down and loss ratios manageable if risk managers pay special attention to the tendency of adjusters to increase prices rather than engage in what may appear to be an inconvenient negotiation. 

One of the world’s largest re-insurers, Munich Re, now estimates that companies will have to pay out a total of $45 billion to cover Katrina-related costs.  Less than one month later, a sister storm, Hurricane Rita, added $10 billion more to the figure of incurred losses. The burden of costs such as these can constitute a massive dilemma for some insurers—more so than a single jolt  to the loss ratio bottom line. As of June 1, A.M. Best noted four insurer failures that have been tied directly to the punch of the 2004-2005 storms.

No matter what the scope of the loss, implementing a tougher override policy by management will certainly be a step in the right direction toward reducing costs wherever possible and keeping a carrier’s claims function as profitable as possible during a time that typically generates considerable losses.

Anticipating problems with overrides related to this year’s storm season, MSB’s professional claims analysts looked at overrides from its client companies resulting from adjusting storm damage due to Katrina and found a troubling pattern for risk managers to consider. In terms of dollars overridden, based upon MSB’s review and analysis of data collected for the storm-ravaged area, it was determined that 5.8 percent of the total of loss payments for Katrina was the result of overpayments made due to overriding. If this percentage were applied to the total dollar figure of Katrina-related costs, it would amount to roughly $2.6 billion. Several materials categories were flagged as accounting for a high percentage of overrides themselves. Two categories alone, Debris and Shingles, constituted fully 34.8 percent of the insurers’ total override dollars.

A full-fledged effort to moderate the costs associated with the CAT takes place when MSB’s research staff begins its immediate response to the storm. As soon as the storm hits, the researchers designate an area to conduct an investigation into prices as part of an analysis of supply and labor costs following the storm. They talk directly to suppliers and labor sources to find out if the cost of specified supplies has changed as well as to determine if the labor costs have themselves changed or remain the same.

“Our focus is typically on shingles, drywall, carpeting, and windows. However, if there is something unique to the region, we’ll add it to our list for examination,” MSB’s Claims Data Product Manager Kevin Bye observed.

The research staff’s examination may continue for eight weeks but could run as long as six months. As MSB Research sees prices change, they produce a detailed storm database of prices for that region and make it available to their clients within a week through MSB’s website. Over the past two years, the researchers have modified the information they have delivered to give clients a greater level of detail. For the 2006 storm season, MSB is unveiling a total component cost database with prices adjusted at the three-digit zip level.

MSB’s level of reporting is unique in the insurance industry, according to Bye, who observed that the research is done at the “stick-and-stone” level—a microscopic look at actual costs that constitute the actual price, not the contractor’s “ask” price. The savings insurers enjoy as a result of being armed with this granular level of detail in their fight against loss leakage are sizeable.

Two MSB Analytics Account Managers issued a caveat to risk managers regarding overrides. John Loveall and Martha Ducharme, encourage their clients, both risk managers and adjusters, to be especially diligent in researching their own data to verify that the figure they are going to change in an override of an estimate line is in line with actual costs, “not just something being requested by a contractor.” Loveall recommends segregating the costs to make precise determinations about what is actually going to be overridden.

“Adjusters need to ask themselves, ‘Do the changes reflect just the price of material or are they changing labor costs as well?’ Adjusters must delineate between the two; and they definitely shouldn’t change a line item purely to accommodate a contractor’s estimate,” Loveall noted.

 Ducharme also warned, “Adjusters should certainly not change a line item without substantiating the validity of the price requested by the contractor. In fact, as a general rule of thumb, adjusters shouldn’t need to override often at all. The override should be the exception, not the practice.”

Naturally, some changes need to be made to reflect regional conditions. If the changes are valid, Ducharme said, the adjuster needs to submit a Request for Information (RFI) to MSB’s research team. The researchers will then verify the accuracy of the pricing that has been requested for the adjustment. The level of validation is scrupulously detailed to help claims departments keep their severities down to a minimum. In fact, MSB’s research team validates data three different ways to get a microscopic picture of real costs before that data is placed in the database for use.

If the adjustment is valid based on the researched pricing, MSB will change the price in its own database system to reflect the new pricing, Loveall explain

Changes to a line item shouldn’t recur, however. Because MSB researches roughly 4,500 items on a quarterly basis its data is the most up-to-date and detailed on the market. “We research over 2,600 data research points, i.e. local economies, and examine nearly 26,000 line items. Labor costs alone are researched at 750 localized levels to determine the prevailing labor rates in 150 core cities,” Loveall observed.

MSB’s research methodology is giving insurers the solutions they need to keep the negative impact of this year’s CAT season on their loss ratios to a minimum. 

No Comments » | Posted in General, Catastrophe, Feature Articles |



Top Of Page

Subscribe to Analytics Answer RSS

Categories

Links

Admin